Patent + Policy – The Future of Patent Remedies
Presented by American University Washington College of Law and the University of Utah – S.J. Quinney College of Law
Tuesday, November 11, 2014 | Room 603 | 8:30am-1:00pm
American University Washington College of Law | Live Webcast
Over the past few years, the once-placid world of patent remedies has been thrown into upheaval. Judicial decisions and pronouncements by enforcement agencies have both put pressure on traditional doctrines relating to damages, fee recovery and injunctive relief. This symposium explored recent developments and the future trajectory of patent remedies law from a judicial, regulatory and legislative standpoint.
There has been some online coverage of the event, reposted here with permission:
- Leah Nylen for M-Lex Market Insight. More Discussion Needed on ‘Constructive Refusals to Negotiate,’ DOJ, Ericsson Lawyers Say.
- Tom Cotter. Comparative Patent Remedies. Conference on Patent Remedies at American University. Coverage of: Session on Injunctive Relief Remedies | Session on Monetary Damages
Agenda
8:30-9:00 – Registration and Coffee
9:00-9:05 – Welcome
9:05-10:00 – Panel 1: Remedies and Standards-Essential Patents
Moderator: Jorge Contreras – University of Utah, S.J. Quinney College of Law
Panel:
Tom Cotter – University of Minnesota
Dina Kallay – Ericsson
Jeff Totten – Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Frances Marshall – U.S. Dept. of Justice, Antitrust Division
10:05-10:55 – Panel 2: Injunctive Relief Developments
Moderator: Michael Carroll – American University Washington College of Law
Panel:
Suzanne Munck – Federal Trade Commission
Jim Sherwood – Google, Inc.
Paul Schoenhard – Ropes & Gray
11:00-12:00 – Panel 3: Monetary Damages: Royalties, Lost Profits and Costs
Moderator: Jonas Anderson – American University Washington College of Law
Panel:
Rob Lytle – Microsoft, Inc
David Cavanaugh – WilmerHale
Matt Levy – Computer and Communications Industry Ass’n
12:00-1:00 – Lunch
Presented in partnership with the:
