IP at the Supreme Court Series: Chatrie v. United States 

April 27 | 5:00 - 6:00pm EDT | Virtual Only
Registration Required

Moderated by Professor Michael Carroll

American University Washington College of Law regularly invites counsel of record and counsel for selected amici to offer post-argument reflections in intellectual property (and related) cases heard by the Supreme Court. These events are held on the afternoon of oral argument before the Court. 

ISSUE

Issue: Whether the execution of a geofence warrant violated the Fourth Amendment.

Panelists

Veronica Miranda, Associate Director, Technology, Law & Security Program at American University Washington College of Law
Laurel A. Raymond, Jenner & Block LLP, For Petitioner, Okello Chatrie
Katelyn N. Ringrose, McDermott Will & Schulte LLP, Brief of Amici curiae of Center for Democracy and Technology, The Surveillance Technology Oversight Project, Brennan Center for Justice, and Defending Rights & Dissent, in Support of Petitioner
Brent Skorup, Cato Institute, Brief of Amicus Curiae of the Cato Institute, in Support of Petitioner
Eric Wessan, Solicitor General of Iowa, Brief of Amicus Curiae of Iowa, Michigan, 29 States, and the District of Columbia, in Support of Respondent

All Briefs Are Available on SCOTUSblog:  Chatrie v. United States

 

Link to Oral Argument Transcript

Link to Event Recording

 

Decision:

Accommodation Request
If you would like to request disability-related accommodation or accessibility information, please contact PIJIP at pijip@wcl.american.edu.   Requests should be made two weeks before the event date.