Sea Change: The Rising Tide of Pro Bono Legal Services for the Creative Community
August 10, 2020
A new paper by Victoria Phillips, Director of the Glushko-Samuelson Intellectual Property Law Clinic, has been published by the journal IP Theory. The paper argues that the relatively new growth and success of intellectual property law clinics has led to " a rising tide in the availability of pro bono expert legal assistance for the creative community throughout the wider legal marketplace."
Phillips, Victoria (2020) "Sea Change: The Rising Tide of Pro Bono Legal Services for the Creative Community," IP Theory: Vol. 9 : Iss. 1 , Article 6.
Despite the ubiquity of the internet economy and the increasing importance of the creative sector, pro bono legal services have not generally been available to those needing assistance in intellectual property, technology and related fields of the law. Client services available from traditional legal services entities and law firm pro bono hours typically offer general civil and sometimes criminal representation but not more specialized legal help. Little to no relevant intellectual property or related pro bono expertise has been widely available from private law firms, state, local, or national bar associations or legal services entities. Pro bono legal assistance at law school clinics has historically mirrored these generalized offerings. Until recently, very few law school clinics were engaged in any kind of practice serving the creative clients in their communities. In addition, public interest and consumer policy advocacy and impact litigation in IP and technology law by nonprofit groups and academic centers has only recently emerged.
The creation of the earliest pro bono intellectual property law school clinics was revolutionary and the clinics were somewhat controversial in clinical legal education when they first arrived on the scene. However, the vision for these new clinics was simple and modeled on the goals of existing clinical programs. Law students would represent clients in the creative community who had real IP and related legal problems for no fee. Students interested in intellectual property, technology and related areas would finally enjoy an experiential opportunity long available to their classmates in other fields of law. These students would also gain an understanding and appreciation for pro bono service and the public interest dimensions inherent in the intellectual property regime. Most importantly, the new clinics would be a resource for specialized pro bono legal advice to the many communities of creators and those hoping to enter the new internet economy but unable to access assistance in the traditional legal marketplace. In other articles I have explored the growth and maturing of this new and vibrant community of law school intellectual property law and technology clinics.
In this Article, I suggest that the rapid growth and success of the work taken on by the new IP clinic community and the community’s innovative collaboration with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is inspiring a rising tide in the availability of pro bono expert legal assistance for the creative community throughout the wider legal marketplace.