The Human Rights Brief is a publication of the Center for Human Rights and Humanitarian Law at Washington College of Law, American University. Please note that this is copyrighted material. Feel free to download and read articles from The Brief, but these materials may not be republished or reposted without the written permission of The Center for Human Rights and Humanitarian Law.

NGO Advocates for Rights of People With Mental Disabilities

by Fatimah A. Mateen

Mental Disability Rights International (MDRI), a nongovernmental organization (NGO) based at American University, is working to bring international attention to the human rights concerns of people with mentally disabilities.

MDRI is a joint project of the law school's Center for Human Rights and Humanitarian Law and the Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law, an organization that advocates for the civil rights of people with mental disabilities in the United States. This joint effort allows MDRI to utilize "the experience of top human rights and mental disability rights attorneys in the United States," says its director, Eric Rosenthal. Rosenthal, a 1992 graduate of the Georgetown University Law Center, received a fellowship from the Echoing Green Foundation to establish MDRI.

When human rights organizations investigated psychiatric abuses in the past, they focused largely on the institutionalization of political dissidents but MDRI advocates for the rights of all people subject to commitment in a psychiatric institution, says Rosenthal. He explained that this approach to international advocacy was pioneered by WCL professor Herman Schwartz in his work for Human Rights Watch on the rights of prisoners.

Rosenthal hopes that international focus on the problems facing people with mental disabilities will ultimately result in the United Nations appointing a permanent special rapporteur to monitor treatment of people with mental disabilities and drafting a mental disability rights treaty.

Rosenthal is encouraged that for the first time, the U.S. Congress has required the State Department to include the human rights conditions of people around the world with disabilities in its annual country reports. "There is a pressing need for attention to [these] concerns from the human rights community," says Rosenthal. "People with mental disabilities are subject to the most severe forms of cruel, degrading, or inhuman treatment prohibited by human rights treaties."

MDRI's agenda is to document and publicize human rights violations against people with mental disabilities and to create pressure to reform local mental health care systems. It will assist domestic human rights and disability rights organizations in their efforts to improve the condition of people with mental disabilities. MDRI will also assist mental health care providers and governments with technical support to reform their mental health care systems.

In November 1993, MDRI initiated its first project, of documenting the conditions of mental institutions in Uruguay, on behalf of the Instituto de Estudios Legales y Sociales de Uruguay (IELSUR). In addition to Rosenthal, the MDRI team included Leonard S. Rubenstein, director of the Bazelon-Center for Mental Health Law, Clarence Sundram, director of the New York Commission on Quality of Care, and Dr. Humberto Martinez, director of the South Bronx Community Mental Health Council.

The team spent two weeks touring numerous public and private psychiatric institutions throughout Uruguay. Rosenthal says that they discovered that a large portion of psychiatric hospital residents are referred to as "social patients" - persons placed in psychiatric institutions because they are poor, elderly, or mentally retarded, or simply have no place to go. He explains that in Uruguay there is no right to independent judicial review of psychiatric commitment. Neither is there a complaint mechanism to give people in psychiatric institutions a chance to be heard when their rights are violated.

Mental health care providers in Uruguay explained that they institutionalize people as social patients because there are almost no community alternatives. Nonetheless, many service providers indicate their interest in reforming the mental health care system.

"We found a widespread concern about human rights violations of people with mental disabilities in Uruguay," says Rosenthal. "In that respect, the work in Uruguay was very encouraging. There is a real sense on the part of service providers that they would like to bring the system into conformity with international standards."

Protection from harm is one of the most important human rights principles that MDRI will seek to enforce. Under the UN Principles for the Protection of Persons with Mental Illness and for the Improvement of Mental Health Care, every patient shall be protected from acts causing mental distress or physical discomfort, including injury from unjustified medication, and abuse by other patients, staff or others. The MDRI team documented some cases of the inappropriate use of antipsychotic drugs and electric shock treatment on patients for which there could be no medical justification, including people with mental retardation. These medications, which act as powerful sedatives, were prescribed at such high doses that many patents were confined to their beds for much of the day.

While visiting facilities, the MDRI team was able to speak with some patients, many of whom were elderly and had been in institutions for most of their lives. One woman had been in the hospital for 20 years "waiting for her sister to pick her up." Another woman, born in the institution, had no other home. Rosenthal indicates that one of "the complaints we most frequently heard was that the patients had no privacy - there is no place they can go to be alone." In some wards, 30 patients eat, sleep, and spend almost every waking moment together in one large room.

The MDRI team plans to release a report summarizing their findings at a conference in Montevideo this spring or summer. The conference will be used to bring attention to human rights abuses in Uruguay's mental health system. If possible, MDRI will introduce experts to assist IELSUR and other mental disability advocates to work with the government of Uruguay to bring about needed reforms.

In addition, MDRI's report will include a set of recommendations and proposals for the development of community-based service programs. MDRI's next projects will be in Hungary and Ukraine.

©Copyright 1994 The Human Rights Brief


Next Article
Previous Article
Return to this issue's Table of Contents
Return to The Human Rights Brief Home Page